New data is guessed-at and inserted to increase resolution. (Gigapixel AI is claimed to be much cleverer than the standard Photoshop "resize image" algorithms, for example). perhaps.Ī similar process occurs to create more data when images are resized upwards - with more or less "accuracy". Hard to do but theoretically possible with an AI-style approach. Ideally, the Gigapixel AI would be clever enough to create graded colour and tone data that accurately guesses the values of such data that were eliminated in a typical conversion in-camera of the camera's sensor data into an 8bit jpeg. Presumably there has to be an increase in data content in converting from an 8bit to a 16bit file. ![]() It's still unclear to me what this conversion achieves or how it does so - in objectively measurable terms at least. But the claimed functions survive, notably the ability to change a photo from 8bit to 16bit. I very occasionally resort to opening an old JPEG in Adobe Camera Raw to use its features, but it's clear that there's less scope to do many things, such as lift shadows or tame highlights.Īs others have noted, the JPEG > RAW functionality seems to have migrated into Gigapixel. When a JPEG is created a good deal of the original data from the sensor is discarded, and no amount of chicanery will get it back. To me, converting JPEG to raw makes as much sense as trying to unscramble an egg. I have tried in vain to see if there is some way that I can get downloads from iCloud at full file size. That is obvious when I try even simple edits in Lightroom. I get a lot of family photos via iCloud, which drastically compresses iPhone and iPad photos. Hope that helps and let me know if you need more specifics I doubt I would pay for it as a standalone product. I got the software when upgrading as a package deal so did not have to pay extra for the software. Other then that, the benefits can be done with other software. So my summary is that if you are going to do significant post processing in manipulating color of some quite compressed JPEGS, you will see a benefit over other post processing options. Nos as an aside, JPEG to RAW also does some sharpening and tone adjustments which can on average make the image more pleasant to look at yet has nothing to do with converting from JPEG to RAW. High quality JPEGs would not benefit as much. So I put this result in terms of helpful yet mostly helpful for JPEGs that had high compression. It noticeably reduces the color compression artifacts that can raise there head if you are doing post processing that involves color modifications of any sort. Most of the compression is done in the color components (and less so in the luminosity components). besides putting it in 16 bit, a wider color space, it also does its best to remove embedded JPEG artifacts. It prepares you for less degradation if you are going to do post processing of the JPEG (don't get too excited though) It can convert the JPEG ot 16 bit depth, in a wider color space (ProPhoto RGB), and save in TIFF format. it does not create a true raw file which needs to be demosaiced. ![]() does not give you more dynamic range (that is baked into the image) does not increase actual bit depth (yes it converts to 16 bits) Here is what the software does not do based on my understanding If using PS, you also have the Camera Raw Filter which has the same functions. I do have JPEG to RAW and use it on occasions yet the title of the software is extremely misleading and so are the examples of before and after (in my opinion)īefore getting in to that you can already process JPEGs in Lightroom so not sure what operations you want in Lightroom that are missing. The idea that I can convert these JPGs into DNG files so i can use all the tools in Lightroom is very attractive, if it really improves the end result. I also have a lot of JPGs from a family member's (or my own) iPhone. I've learned a lot about the DEVELOP module and all the different ways to process a RAW photo. I shoot only RAW with my Nikon D3, and do all my post in Lightroom. I just learned about this "does it it really work" convertor I'm interested in comments, good and bad, from users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |